Revolution Investment ratings for Akamai, F5, Netflix and six others

Earlier this week, I met a bunch of subscribers to my independent service, TradingWithCody.com, in our chat room for a special “stocks only chat” in which I analyzed 18 different stocks that they wanted to know about.  Here’s the second half of the transcript of that chat.  You can read the first half and find my Revolution Investment ratings for Intel, Micron, Level 3 and six others by clicking here.

Q: AKAM looks like a buy. What do you think? I am ready to pull the trigger. Thanks! A: AKAM – It’s certainly in the right spot, with a proprietary network of servers and switches near end-users of the Internet around the developed world. The Internet would likely run noticeably slower if Akamai didn’t exist. And that’s saying something. At $22 a share and with nearly $3 per share in net cash, the stock’s trading at 12x this year’s earnings and at about 10x current estimates for next year. I think those estimates are too low although pricing pressure has been crimping topline growth of late for these content delivery companies. But at $22 a share, the long-term outlook for this stock is very bright. Revoluion Investment rating: 7/10

Q: Firstly Cody, I want to thank you for your service. You have helped keep my head straight during these tumultuous times, and have helped keep my portfolio from falling with the market. Any view on FFIV? A: FFIV is one of the highest-profile tech stocks on the planet. While people consider FFIV’s competition to be Riverbed and Cisco, some networks are built using all three company’s products. Saving costs and expanding fuctionality of existing bandwidth is a great proposition for most tech purchasing managers and FFIV will likely continue to see growth for many years to come. It’s not cheap at nearly 20x next year’s earnings but it does look cheaper when you consider the net cash on the balance sheet of $10 per share. Rev Inv rating: 8/10

Q: Cody, how about GLUU? A: GLUU – a penny stock that’s not expected to earn any money this year or next and with $12 million total on their balance sheet. It’s a lottery ticket at best. Rev Inv rating: 2/10

Q: Can you analyse INFY for me? It’s the biggest IT stock in India. A: INFY – If you believe that corporate America will continue to get huge tax benefits by laying off Americans and hiring supposed replacements in India for the next ten years, then INFY might be for you. If, on the other hand, you’ve ever dealt with outsourced services to India as a supplier (I’ve hired Indian programmers over the years to help me build websites…never have had a good experience or a product that they’ve built even come to market) or as a consumer (I get paid randomly late if at all by some of the biggest companies I write for and every time I ask “what the hell?” they say, “Payroll and accounts receivable is outsourced to India” and that’s the entire explanation) then you probably should think twice about betting on such outsourcing trends being sustainable. Rev Inv rating: 2/10

Q: Cody, do you like OCLR? A: OCLR – another newly-minted tech penny stock. The company sells components against competitors like JDSU and they all had so much overcapacity back in the late 1990s that they’re still slugging it out trying to rightsize their ships. At less than $5 and with $2 per share net cash per share, this is another one I like just because it’s so down and out cheap. If they can actually earn 25 cents or more next year, this stock will be closer to $10 a share but I’d expect it to struggle to ever get much above that recent $18 a share high it saw late last year. Rev Inv rating: 6/10

Q: Any thoughts on HLIT? Cody’s writing and philosophy is really one of the best things about this advisory service. plus cody’s a great writer. and yeah his buy/sell rocks too. A: HLIT – The company seems to be in the right positioning and the right industry — helping video play on new networks. But the growth and execution have been lacking there since as long as I’ve followed this stock. At $5 a share with $1 per share net cash and with earnings expected to grow from 40 cents to 50 cents in the next year, it’s pretty cheap. But I can’t get comfy with a long-term vision for this one. Rev Inv rating 3/10.

Q: How about COGO? A: COGO – if you believe this Chinese company’s financials, it’s very tempting. The stock trades for less than 5x next year’s earnings estimate and they supposedly sell all the right components for tablets, smartphones and every other growth industry on the tech planet. I have yet to see a small cap tech stock from China work out for investors. I don’t think this one will either. Rev Inv rating: 2/10

Q: What about KITD? A: KITD – Is a better version, but not by much of HLIT. The company sells into what should be an incredibly high growth market – “It offers KIT platform for managing Internet protocol (IP)-based video assets across the browser, mobile device, and IPTV set-top box enabled television sets.” And likewise, hits on all the right catchphrases “Our platforms”. But the company just doesn’t deliver the sustainable growth I’d expect. If they actually earn the 87 cents that analysts are expecting for next year the stock might act all right. But color me skeptical on this one. Rev Inv rating: 3/10

Q: What are your thoughts on Netflix? There has been a very high short % of float going back at least a year, and yet the company keeps performing. Do you think this will continue considering their pricing change and losing Starz’ library? A: NFLX – under assault from it’s suppliers (Starz and other content providers are rebelling), competitors (Amazon, Apple and even YouTube etc are all ramping up services) and spending like crazy to expand in new markets around the world…NFLX has lost the confidence of many investors of late. But the company’s become the de facto standard of Hollywood video watching on the Net and the iPad and that’s going to help fuel much more growth over time. There’s not a lot of cash for the company to work with so they’ve got to execute perfectly. That raises the risks. Rev Inv rating 6/10

Ok guys, that’s it for today. You can imagine my brain’s mushy now after analyzing all those stocks. See you back here at http://tradingwithcody.com/chat next week for a normal chat where you can ask me anything and I’ll answer it. Thanks for reading, thanks for asking about all these stocks and thanks for subscribing!

Click here to read the first half of transcript and find out my Revolution Investment ratings for Intel, Micron and seven other stocks.

Cody Willard writes Revolution Investing for MarketWatch and posts the trades from his personal account at TradingWithCody.com. At time of publication, Cody was net long Apple, Google and Cypress.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • email
  • Print

Five articles that will stop you in your tracks

I got a lot of great feedback about my “Revolution Investing Must-Reads” links column on Monday, so I’m going to start doing these links-with-Cody-commentary columns more often.  Here’s what I’m reading today and a few thoughts about each headline:

Bicycle Stability Versus Table Stability - My old friend David Merkel wrote this piece back in 2007 and republished it today…because it’s just as relevant in the current economic set up as it was back then. As David puts it in his reprint summary: “Is this still true today, 9/14/2011?  Yes.  Yields are rising for low quality companies, and falling for high quality companies.  Analyze your portfolio and see what companies could survive for two years without raising capital.  This is an environment where a company that has to raise capital could find the doors shut.”

Japan puts ex-spokesman in charge of nuclear crisis – I’ve been worried that one of the next so-called Black Swan events that could roil these markets could end up being yet another re-run of recent past Black Swan events.  More to the point, is it possible that we’ve overlooked just how bad the damage and ongoing fallout over the Fukushima disaster is and will get?  Yes, of course. That said, (first, my heart continues to go out to all the people affected by this tragedy) the market would likely panic on any such new developments from the Fukushima disaster but that such panic would probably be a buying opportunity as it was last time.  And finally in regards to this headline — does the fact that the Japanese Prime Minister if putting a spokesman in charge of the crisis a good sign or a bad sign?

Bank Of America: ‘Phase I” Of Cost-Cutting Will Eliminate 30000 Jobs and UBS To Layoff 3500‎ – Banks and bank profits are way too big as a percentage of history, as I’ve outlined several times before (see How to fight the bank bailouts and profit while doing so, for example).  These are not the last of the big lay offs from the big banks that we’ve spent trillions propping up only to see them eventually shrink to size anyway.

Broadcom’s acquisition makes it a buy –  What does Netlogic make that Broadcom wants so badly? “Netlogic’s products are designed into various systems, such as switches, routers, wireless base stations, access aggregation, radio network controllers, security appliances, networked storage appliances, service gateways, and connected media devices offered by original equipment manufacturers.” You know, that whole App/Smartphone/Tablet/Cloud infrastructure thing we’ve been investing in.  This won’t be the last 50% pop in this sector.  Hopefully we’ve got the next one on our sheets already. (See exactly what stocks I’m investing in at TradingWithCody.com, by the way.)

At TechCrunch Conference, Talk of a Bubble – Been a while since we saw talk of “Talk of a Bubble” in the headlines. As usual, I’d much rather be on the other side of the worries in the headlines and if they’re still worried that tech’s already in a bubble…I’d consider that very bullish for tech.  Oh, and by the way, anybody else notice that Amazon, Priceline, Apple and several other of those old “bubble stocks” are much higher than they were back in those “bubble days” anyway?

Oh, and I’m doing a special “Stock questions only” Q&A with subscribers of TradingWithCody.com today at 2pm EST.  You can get a free one week trial signing up here if you’d like to ask me to analyze a specific stock for you today.  I’ll give each stock I analyze a Revolution Investment rating on a scale from 1 to 10.  See you there!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • email
  • Print

Must-reads: Greece collapse is bullish, Dick Cheney on twitter and more

Greece and the banks and Germany’s will to bail out other Euro countries. Have you heard?!  These are the headlines that matter today…at least according to the mainstream media.  I haven’t done a “Must-reads” posts with links in a while.  Here’s some of what I’m reading right now with some Cody-commentary on each.

Something Stinks in Euroland - Simon, an old friend of mine, finishes his article quoting another old friend of mine, Michael Darda, “There is potential for very large systemic global shock,” he says and paints a picture of European government defaults, and multiple countries leaving the euro.”  I agree with that part.  But what about the next sentence, the conclusion: “Eventually it could drag down the entire world economy, he says.”

I sure don’t think that Greece and Euro falling apart would be bad for the economy at all. Indeed, as I wrote the last time we were supposed to panic over Greece in Let the Euro die and the bull market resume - “Did you know that the DJIA was up 20% per year for the five years heading into the initiation of the Euro?   The markets gave more than 10% annualized returns for the decade before the Euro started.  And in the decade since, the markets have been roiled and rangebound.   In the first five years after the Euro started, the markets went straight DOWN.  Not up.”

Semi’s (and I dont mean the truck) – Some rather objective trading analysis for a tech sector and stocks like Texas Instruments, NSM and Altera that have been hit in the recent market downturn.

Hacker Rattles Security Circles and My Interview with former Vice President Dick Cheney - I didn’t listen to the interview, but this quote from the former VP of the “Free World” caught my eye, “On tonight’s show host Michael Castner asks the VP if he plans to tweet. Cheney says: “You loose your privacy when you get plugged into that system.” One of the truest statements from the Republican/Democrat Rulers in a long time.  And yes, I’m on twitter anyway, @codywillard.

TV Viewing Still Growing Making TV Stocks Attractive - A more bullish take than my own (see Sell! Sell! Cablevision admits their business model is “badly broken”, for example) on the TV industry in an Internet-video world.

Bartz quits Yahoo board: report - Yahoo’s up 12% since Bartz was given the heave-ho.  It was up 4% during her years running the place.  Yahoo’s probably got more upside than downside for the next few months.  Microsoft would also get a boost if they’d give CEO Ballmer the heave-ho, IMHO. Ho, ho, ho.

Indicator Update for 9/11/11 – Good discussion of current economic indicators layered up on top of a trading outlook.  From the article: “In conclusion, most of these charts still support a bullish outlook (albeit a less bullish outlook compared to a year ago), especially in the context of a market that once again has become extremely bearish. Although there has been some deterioration in the economy’s growth fundamentals over the past year and in recent months, but there is still no indication that the economy is at risk of another recession.”   Italics are mine. I mean, “No indication”?  Interesting.

Cody Willard: Trading updates on Apple, Cisco, gold and much more and Who says markets can’t go up during a recession anyway? – I met a bunch of subscribers to my independent service, TradingWithCody.com, for our weekly chat and we had a blast, as usual.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • email
  • Print

Obama’s job plan will send us into a stock market bubble

There was a speech by some leader of the supposed “Free World” last night?

Ah, yes.  The Republican/Democrat Regime’s current puppet leader came out with a $500 billion corporate welfare program to further boost the biggest companies’ earnings last night.   Corporate profits as a percentage of GDP were already at historically record levels.  I expect that more corporate welfare will further boost corporate profits in coming quarters.

To be clear then — I am sick and appalled by both parties’ ability to continuously and blatantly expand corporate profits as a percentage of GDP (rather than say trying to grow GDP and to simply level the playing field and apply all laws and taxes equally to everybody and every company…exactly as was called for in our constitution with that whole “justice is blind” concept), but just because we are appalled at it, doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try to profit on it.

And that’s just it.  The government’s forcing you to figure out how to get any kind of return on any kind of money you might have (how’s that 0.5% interest rate that the Fed enables the banks to borrow money so that you have to lend the banks your money at that same rate going to help you build your nest egg?).

And if that much time and energy from our corporate leaders is spent coming up with these new ways to artificially boost corporate profits while pretending to do so in the name of “labor”….

Well, I expect that all this will indeed help propel this stock market and many of what would otherwise be smaller/less-profitable companies into a big ol’ bubble.  Just like these policies have done throughout my lifetime….how many bubbles have you seen in the last ten years alone?

Nothing has changed the overall political and macroeconomic set up and our playbook remains the same after last night’s “Jobs speech”.

As for our portfolio and trading today, Sandisk and Marvell are both popping again, despite Texas Instruments’ and Corning both having warned about the present quarter.  The commentary isn’t “we can’t stay up with demand”, but as I’ve said repeatedly, even in this current economic/consumer soft patch we are experiencing, corporate profits remain in growth mode.  And profit growth is probably what will drive these stocks just as it usually does.

Indeed, Texas Instruments is actually up fractionally after that guide-down.  And Corning is down only in magnitude with the broader markets’ action itself.

I’m not expecting to do a whole lot of trading again today.  We’ve had a big bounce of the recent lows in the portfolio and I’m continuing to let our hard-earned positioning play itself out according to the playbook.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • email
  • Print

Best stocks to be long and short into year end

I met a bunch of subscribers to my independent service, TradingWithCody.com, for our weekly chat and we had a blast, as usual.  I’ve broken the chat down into two disparate (but not desperate!) sections:

1. Economy/markets/trading/strategy questions

2. Questions about individual stocks

Click here to read the Q&A about the economy, markets, trading and strategy.  Read on for the stock Q&A.  And be sure to check out TradingWithCody.com where I post all my trades in real-time.

Stocks

Q: Do you see all the cheaper tablet alternatives, especially in Asia (where there is an expectation for Apple to take off), affecting Apple’s margins, and hence growth plans, significantly? A: Great question about the margins at Apple and how they could be affected by mass cheap tablets…but the iPad is so much better and still ain’t exactly “expensive”…and further, I expect Apple will someday start selling iPad 2 for $200 or so after iPad 3 comes out at full price. Or maybe they’ll wait for iPad 4. Who knows. But Apple will likely have some very cheap iPads out there for you to buy in a few years just like they did with the iPhone after a few years.

Q: Cody, great job so far. Been with you for 4 months or so and have been very pleased. On August 17, we bought near term ADSK calls–actually the only near term calls we have ever bought. They are well out of the money at this point and was wondering what your thoughts were on this equity. A: Oh, the ADSK — that thing has been wildly volatile lately. The fundamentals, barring a complete collapse in the macroeconomy, are fine. I plan on holding ADSK for a couple years, but I don’t know if you’ll get lucky enough to get those near-term calls profitable in the next few weeks.

Q: Any views on INFN? A: The company’s only valued at $800MM total. They’ve got nearly $300MM in net cash in the checking account. That means you can buy the company at essentially $500MM enterprise value. The problem is that they aren’t profitable last year and will probably break even next year or so….so what’s the catalyst? I like the stock at these levels as a value investment, but I’m not pulling any triggers on it personally.

Q: Hi Cody, I have been a subscriber for two months and I am extremely happy with the service. I missed the entire LPS trade, and I would like to get into it. Do you think LPS is a short at this level, or shall we wait for a bounce above $19.00? A: Thanks for the kind words. I was just looking at LPS’ chat and also doing a bunch of homework on just how badly they really look to be screwed…I don’t see how that stock ever gets legs again, frankly. I might add to the short or buy some more puts in this one this week no matter where the stock is.

Q: Think LPS might get a pop if Obama recommends some mortgage problem help in his speech? If it does move then, would Friday be a good time to consider buying the puts? A: You just made my day with those kind words. Thanks for subscribing from the beginning! Yes, LPS could pop on something like Obama saying he’s going to prop up housing prices and try to brush under the rug the fraud in the industry. Indeed, the only catalyst I can see to the upside for LPS at all is political favoritism somehow coming into help them. In five years though (two years?), I think LPS will be gone. Hasta la vista. Zero.

Q: When do you think it is it time to short GLD and SLV? A: I think the big 4% drop in gold today might be a good indicator that the shorting time is nigh. But I’m not pulling any triggers til I really see the gold bugs start to cry.

Q: Do you ever trade AIG? Because today’s 10% pop is beginning for something. I know it is trash stock but for trade? What do you think? A: I wouldn’t gamble on AIG with my worst ex-girlfriend’s money. It is a, IMHO, totally insolvent, criminal enterprise that needs to be shut down immediately but continues to thrive using welfare funds. Game it at your own risk!

Q: Cody, I love what you are doing for us,thanks a lot.  Do you think we can do any trades, not investments, on RIMM earnings coming soon? A: I don’t like the RIMM much from the short or the long side right now at $31. When it hit $24 or so, I answered a question in this chat room saying something like “RIMM’s too low to short now” and it popped big since then. I don’t see any particular upside catalysts for the stock in the near-term, but the chart itself has turned up nicely and maybe just some tradeable action there. Not for me though.

Q: I am holding January $17.50 Cisco calls which are slightly in the green again. Do you see upside for Cisco toward year end or is it best to close out? I also hold January 13 calls so I am optimistic–thanks for your stock and market strategies. A: I’m also holding a wide array of Cisco calls. I wouldn’t own them at all if I didn’t think the stock was about to go higher into year end. I hope/pray it will. But hoping and praying isn’t an invest-able strategy. That said, I do think Cisco is trying to bottom here near $15 or so and I’ll probably continue to be a buyer. Going back to an earlier question about shorting puts….Shorting Cisco out-of-the-money puts wouldn’t be the worst idea ever. But I’m sticking with Cisco common and calls (though as I recall I was a seller of some of my calls when the stock popped after I’d been buying the calls before its earnings report even though I still have a wide array of those calls left).

Q: Cody, thoughts on ZAGG? I’ve had good results writing put options as they provide a decent return and the stock has been stable during the downturn. Potential upside for calls/common as the iPhone5 is due to be released? A: ZAGG’s a tough one. I spooked myself out of it when a colleague asked me about it a few months ago and I’m still not comfortable with it. Be careful with that one. My “spidey senses” go off when I study ZAGG and I can’t tell you why because I don’t know why ZAGG makes my spidey senses go off. But it does. So I stay away. Good luck with it tho!

Q: I had a question about Micron. It seems to be trading at a 30% discount to book value. Is this undervalued enough to buy, or do you not like the company enough? A: I don’t look at “book value” in my investment strategies much at all. I look at net cash, earnings, cash flows, EBITDA, margins…and also top down analysis like market positioning, sector growth, etc. I do like MU near $6, but I’d rather own SNDK at $37.

Q: Great call on the RVBD calls at the bottom. I loaded up as you did and they’re nicely profitable! Would you consider our latest downturn a triple bottom? If so, we have rebounded very nicely. How long is your gut telling you the rally might run for? Would it make sense to slap some out of the money puts on RVBD if it gets up around $27-$28? A: I do think we are trying to put in bottoms, but that doesn’t mean we have for sure. I’d like to see some of these stocks get back to where they were a few months ago before the next rally is truly over. But that’s a tall order.

Q: Cody, I am a new subscriber, but have been following you for a couple of months and I am really enjoying the service and your sense of humor. What do you think of AVAV? A: AeroVironment, Inc. designs, develops, produces, and supports unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), and efficient energy systems for various industries and governmental agencies. I don’t want to invest in companies that are dependent upon expanding wars for growth. In the next five to ten years, I expect our war expenditures to drastically decline one way or another. I’d look to eventually get short AVAV.

Read the economy/markets/trading/strategy Q&A by clicking here.

Check out TradingWithCody.com by clicking here.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • email
  • Print

We can learn a lot about trading from horses and cowboys

Monty Roberts, the great horsewhisperer whose autobiography I am currently reading, talks about how horses are “lean into” animals.  That is, they lean into pressure.  You want a horse to turn left, you don’t get a team of wranglers to push him on his right side — you can simply, by yourself, usually get him to go left with a couple hands putting pressure into his left side.  Think about how you can make a horse turn left by applying pressure to his ribcage with your heel while you’re riding him.

Now think about how that applies to your trading.   Are you a “lean into” animal?  I would think great traders are a lot like horses, in that they lean into and go counter to whatever direction the pressure is coming from.

Meanwhile, on another but perhaps similar saddle, the only fish I caught the whole weekend while spending a magical weekend with my father on the mountain rivers of southern Colorado, was one single 19″ rainbow trout. Fish are not “lean into” animals.  No pics this fishing trip — it was just for memories.

And what about the markets’ action, you ask?  It’s been a wild ride for any us longs left who remained in this arena after that wild mustang, Mr. Market, had bucked most of the weaker-handed cowboys out of this market.

Here’s a great example of Monty Roberts’ magic with horses:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Dx91mH2voo

Monty breaks a horse and saddles him and gets a rider on him in less than thirty minutes

As for trading right now, I’m continuing to mostly handsit here and not force things. We did a lot of buying, scaling, nibbling in our favorite longs such as Apple, Google and Sandisk and some short covering while the markets were much lower than they are now, and the positioning we’ve got now, with lots of calls that are kicking in on this rally, some core common stock and some short bets against Wells Fargo, LPS, and Live Nation and others is about where my playbook tells me to be for now. All that said, at some point, I plan on doing a little more scaling into some of my smallest positions down at the bottom of my weekly holdings list (see: Latest positions and some trout to catch…). But no rush and will look to “lean into” whatever trades I do make next.

We can a learn a lot about trading from cowboys and horses. Seriously.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • email
  • Print

Cody Willard: Have we really bottomed?

It’s a brand new week.  And the markets are up again.  Last week, when we were under DJIA 11,000, I wrote:

I do think we’re getting closer to bottoming sooner rather than later.  I’ll rephrase — I think this market might finally be putting in a bottom around the 10,800 level or so.   And I’m going to be a steady buyer any time we dip from 11,000 as I have been doing thus far. (I think this market might finally be putting…) –

We are now up nearly 7% from that 10,800 level, and while I wouldn’t dare say we have for sure bottomed and moved on from below the DJIA 11,000, the further and longer we steadily move away from that level, the harder it gets to test it again.

Meanwhile, Riverbed’s now up nearly 20% from where it was last week when I bought the calls in the name:

As I’d written at the time (see: I’ve now finally stepped up and done my first purchase of some…):

Riverbed’s been dripping steadily lower as I’ve been patiently waiting to add to it once again since we had sold most of our calls when it was indeed over $40.  (see: Let’s talk about some important trading strategies that I’m employing right now, for example).

I’ve now finally stepped up and done my first purchase of some Riverbed since then.  I’m buying calls dated out to December and January around the $25 strike price. –

Cody back again in real-time here.  I’m not selling any of the calls just yet.  Indeed, I’m holding steady all of the calls I added near-the-lows, including our recent Apple, Google, and Autodesk positions (see: I’ve stepped up and done some buying despite the emotions taking over out there…, for example), all of which have now rallied nicely off their lows, giving us some profits, at least for now.

I’m aggressively long as I’ve been a buyer below DJIA 11,000, and sometimes aggressively in the last couple weeks.  And that’s got our positioning set up nicely to increase our longside leverage if we continue to rally and to limit our downside exposure if we fall back to those recent levels.

I also asked everybody last week to weigh in on whether the bulls or the bears were more scared.  The answer, coming from more than 100 respondents, was almost unanimous: the bulls.  Before I go, and now that we’ve rallied nearly 7% from the lows…I’ll ask again. Has it changed yet?  Who’s more scared, the bulls or the bears?

No trades for me yet today.  Easy does it now that we’re being rewarded for having bought aggressively into the teeth decline back when it was so hard to do so.

If you’d like to see how every trade I personally make in the coming days, weeks and years, come check me out at TradingWithCody.com.  For a limited time, you can get a free one-week trial with just your email address by signing up here.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • email
  • Print

Rick Perry loves big government and other true political stories

I spoke to a group of politically active, so-called conservatives last week at a hotel here in my New Mexico hometown.  One of the topics that kept coming up was whether I despised Texas Gov. Rick Perry as much as I despised most other candidates that the Republican/Democrat regime is trying to force me to pick from in the next election.

Let’s think through some deep thoughts and do fact-checking on Perry and the entire Left/Right paradigm as most people seem to see it right now:

You can spend about five minutes on the governor’s official website confirming that Rick Perry is yet another big-government, corporate-welfare lover from the Republican side of the Republican/Democrat regime, whose policies are fundamentally no different from the Clinton/Bush/Obama policies of years past.

Apparently, for example, the government doesn’t create jobs except when it’s welfare for Office Depot Inc. (ODP):

Gov. Perry: Fiscal Responsibility is Essential for Prosperity and Job Creation: Perry noted that government doesn’t create jobs; it creates the environment for jobs to grow. He credited Texas’s economic strength to the state’s low taxes, reasonable and predictable regulatory climate, fair legal system and skilled workforce.

Gov. Perry Announces TEF Investment in Office Depot to Create More Than 200 Jobs in Central Texas: Perry has announced the state is investing $300,000 through the Texas Enterprise Fund in Office Depot for the creation of the company’s new Inside Sales organization in Austin. Contingent upon the completion of a local incentive agreement, this investment will create 203 new jobs and a multimillion-dollar capital investment.

Sigh.  I mean, what can you say?  Maybe, with more welfare help from the taxpayers of the city of Austin, Perry’s government wants to take credit for creating 203 new jobs by giving $300,000 of welfare money from the taxpayers of Texas to Office Depot?  But Perry says government doesn’t create jobs.

Don’t stop looking for the giveaways there … $300,000 is chump change compared to the amount of welfare that the energy industry gets from the taxpayer of Texas via Perry’s stewardship.  It took me another five minutes to find this on another Texas government website:

Texas State and Local Energy Subsidies: The Comptroller’s Office also compiled an estimate of state and local energy subsidies for 2006. In Texas, state and local subsidies totaled $1.4 billion in 2006. Oil and gas garnered most of the subsidies with an estimated 99.6%. However, the oil and gas subsidies constituted only 1.5% of all Texas spending on oil and gas since the estimated total spending on the oil and gas industry was $94.7 billion in 2006.

I’m pretty sure I read that Perry is the longest-serving governor in Texas history, which would mean that he was in charge back in 2006.  Wonder how much the Texan welfare fund for energy is costing tax payers now.

Is Perry a rightie?  Is Obama is a leftist? I can’t tell which is which.  Can you?

Let’s see … $14 trillion in bailouts from Bush and Obama in the last three years. Is that left or right?

$1 trillion for Obamacare over the next 10 years that seems to benefit the health-care lobby much more than it does the general public. Is that left or right?

Expanding our wars in the Arab world: Is that left or right? Did Bush II or Bush the First do that or did Obama do that?  Wait, I’m confused.

Expanding Medicare and Medicaid budgets … didn’t Bush II and Reagan expand Medicare and Medicaid? Were they left or right again?

Increase taxes on the rich?  How about we just stop bailing out the rich?  Is that a left stance or a right stance?  That’s my stance, anyway.  I mean, for example, the banks and their shareholders and their lenders are on welfare and we’re talking about increasing taxes on them?  How about just taking the whole of corporate America off welfare and simplifying the whole tax code?

The upshot: Don’t let the ongoing fake debate distract you from the trillions and 0% rates that are really what are more likely to drive our economy.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • email
  • Print

Stocks for this market

Here’s the second part of this week’s Q&A.

I meet up every Wednesday at 2pm EST with subscribers to my independent serviceTradingWithCody.com in our chat room. For readers here of my blog here on MarketWatch, I’ve broken this week’s chat down into two articles again.  The second article (below) is full of our discussion about individual stocks that I’m investing in and trading right now.  The other article, which you can read by clicking here, is full of subscriber questions and my answers about the markets, the economy and general trading strategies.

Get into next week’s chat by signing up for a free one-week trial of TradingWithCody.com with just your email address. Click here.

Stocks

Q: Do you like Google more, less, or the same after the Motorola purchase? I’m reading mixed things about it but it seems like $530 is a very good entry point. A: I think the biggest untold story with the Goog-ola (Google for Motorola deal) is the set-top box business. Google TV and Android Apps are going to try to gain de facto standardization in the living room…Google’s going after Microsoft’s XBOX platform every bit as much as they’re going after the iPhone with this purchase. I like Google more now than before.

Q: Is AAPL at all threatened by Google’s move? Do you like AAPL as much as before? A: I think Apple is definitely having some “holy cow this changes everything” meetings in Cupertino CA this week. But Apple will be fine.

Q: What are you hearing about advance orders for the next gen iPhone and iPad? A: I’ve not heard much about pre-orders for either — I think the iPad 3 is pushed out for a few months for lack of components to build masses of it. iPhone 5 is coming in a few weeks probably and it will be huge, of course, IMHO.

Q: Have you ever looked at Constant Contact CTCT, they have 0 debt opening new offices and my company uses it all the time. They provide a great and cheap way to market your business during times when money is an issue. They are near their 52 wk low. Your thoughts? Have you ever came across it in your research? A: I just looked CTCT over a bit, and they don’t have any debt, but they don’t have much cash either. They are pretty cheap and growing according to the analysts, but the fact that the only headlines are BS press releases from the company throws up some big red flags. Got a feeling this company is a lot of hype and little substance. I’m not going to dig further on it and maybe that’s my bad. Q: Ok, thanks for looking into it Cody!! I really appreciate it.

Q: If I wanted to buy some LPS puts what would you suggest?? A: I want to buy some LPS puts too! I’ll let you know as soon as I see the markets throw us a new pitch for LPS with what looks to me like good timing and pricing.

Q: I am holding LPS Sept put at the 25 strike as I know you are as well. As we get closer to Sept what are your plans for these puts? Since you believe as I do it still has downside are you going to roll into the Dec puts and if so at what strike? A: Oh man, I don’t know what I’m gonna do with these LPS puts. This stock has driven me mad even as it’s been one of the most profitable short bets of my career. I plan on staying short this thing and would love to get shorter on sustained rallies in the name, but sheesh, it just fades lower and lower and never upticks to give me a chance go build it. I’ll detail my strategy as I execute it…after I’ve figured it out.

Q: What is your strategy, if any, moving forward with RVBD? A: I’d gotten rather lucky with the Riverbed trade as we’d sold most of our common and calls when it was near its highs and I’d explained this strategy in detail as I was doing it. The calls I own are now far out of the money but they still have a few months on them, so I’m holding them steady for now. I do plan on buying my full Riverbed common and call positions back in coming days or weeks but am in no rush.

Q: MRVL is going to report tomorrow. What are your views on this? I already own some Jan 2012 calls which I bought when it was around 12 last week and have some gains in it too. Should we hold? The reason I am asking this is , unlike in someof the last successful earnings plays like CSCO, SNDK, GOOG more people are bullish on MRVL onmarketwatch.com (getting this from reading articles and analyst estimates). What do your sources say about it. Are they more bearish than bullish? A: I think the analysts are mostly looking for an ugly report and have been taking their estimates lower in recent weeks. That’s because RIMM’s a big customer of Marvell. I think that concern is more than priced in and that the company might even surprise to the upside tomorrow night. Q: I think you are right. I did see the analyst estimates going down in the last 15-20 days. And RIMM. That seems to be a priced in too by the recent moves. Thanks. I was skeptical to hold or not to hold. But since I own long dates calls I wont worry now. A: One lesson I’ve learned over the years about EVERY SINGLE POSITION ALWAYS is this: Worry. You should always worry. Complacency is the enemy. (I’m not saying you’re being complacent, I’m just saying — I ALWAYS WORRY.)

Q: I have the MRVL common and heavy calls I bought and already some of them are 10% up. Wondering is that good to keep or sell them. For ADSK also, I have calls. Can I buy more calls for ADSK expiring in Aug in two days? A: I can’t tell you what to do with your positions, but I can tell you that I’m buying a little bit of ADSK calls today and a little common too. And I’m holding my Marvell calls steady for now, as I’ve been a buyer of them in recent weeks, as detailed in real-time here on the site.

Q: ADSK reports tomorrow; large call activity on August 15 4x normal; buy before E? A: I don’t look much at the “call action” before a report — I look more at the stock chart itself and mostly at the analyst reports heading into the report. The analysts aren’t universally bearish on ADSK, but they are pretty bummed about it and talking it down. Such near-term analysis and trading into earnings isn’t science — it’s art. So I’m using a water color brush instead of oils. (I took that analogy too far, didn’t I?) Q: I have noticed your exceptional calls, prior to earnings — CSCO, GOOG, SNDK come to mind — so stick with the water color.

Join me for next week’s chat by signing up for a free one-week trial of TradingWithCody.comwith just your email address. Click here.

Cody Willard writes Revolution Investing for MarketWatch and posts the trades from his personal account at TradingWithCody.com. At time of publication, Cody was net long Google, Apple, Riverbed, Microsoft, Autodesk and net short LPS.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • email
  • Print

Trading strategies for this market

I meet up every Wednesday at 2pm EST with subscribers to my independent serviceTradingWithCody.com in our chat room. For readers here of my blog here on MarketWatch, I’ve broken this week’s chat down into two articles again. The first article (below) is full of our  economy/marketing/trading/strategy discussion.  The second article, which you can read by clicking here, is full of subscriber questions and my answers about individual stocks.

Join me for next week’s chat by signing up for a free one-week trial of TradingWithCody.comwith just your email address. Click here.

I have your car towed all the way to your house and all you’ve got for me is *lite* beer? - Biff Tannen

Economy/markets/trading/strategy

Q: Why do you buy common stock at times and other times you buy calls? What factors go into you decision? A: There are lot of factors that go down into deciding between common and calls. Some factors include: 1. How expensive are the traders pricing the calls? If the calls let me get long-term upside leverage cheap, I’ll usually put in a little bit of capital there, even if I also own the common. 2. Do I expect near-term catalysts? If I do, such as we have done with the Cisco, Google and Sandisk call buying before their earnings reports, which I expected to be catalysts, then I’ll get more aggressive in the calls, even if I have to pay up on the premiums. 3. How much common do I have in the name and how long have I held it? That is a nuanced factor, but one that seems to play into my decision-making on common-vs-calls often. Great question.

Q: What is your view of the financial sector medium term? I have started scaling into FAS looking for some recovery by YE. A: I’m short the financial sector and looking to get shorter in it in the medium term if there is any strength in these insolvent-but-for-fraudulent-accounting-and-welfare banks into year-end.

Q: If one is bearish on Financials it would seem that the market would have a hard time advancing without this sector. I will be keen to see when your stance on Financials changes. A: Think about my stance this way — if the financials finally get their commeupance and crash, perhaps the rest of the stock market will too. But I don’t think they’d be crushed as bad as the financials would anyway. Meanwhile, if the markets bubble and the government allows the banks to survive in tact despite being fraudulent and insolvent, then I think my stocks will far outperform on the upside too.

Q: What are you seeing that makes you think we will see a Bubble forming and stocks rising for the next 10 years vs a bear market forming and double dip recession? A: That’s a HUGE question and not one easily answered in a Q&A chat like this (reminds me of trying to debate anything meaningful in TV soundbites!). But long story short — the Fed’s 0% rates and the trillions in additional explicit and implicit quantitative easing is likely fomenting asset bubbles as we type. The “forced trade” from the ultra-low interest rates from the central planners of the Republican/Democrat Regime is indeed going to force people into risking their capital and creating new asset bubbles. Including in smartphones/cloud/tablets. Q: Huge question- Ok but stocks act terribly to earnings and for now it FEELS like the only bubble they will see is if they chew lots of gum. I get the 0% rates to force people to grow assets in the only game left to grow them in that being stocks, but from 2008-9 great recession, 2010 flash crash and this years crash has most likely left people not just 2nd guessing but 3rd and 4th guessing the stock market and its casino like gamble like roller coaster not resembling anything trustworthy for money to grow over time.

Q: Hi,  I’m currently a member subscribing on a month to month basis.  Can I switch over to the yearly option? A: If you go and sign up for the annual subscription today, we will refund this month’s $99 fee and get you all set up.  Thanks for upgrading!

Q: In our last chat I was talking about the Head and shoulder pattern that everybody was talking about. Seems it played out badly for everybody. Now everybody is talking about a double dip. Whereas you are in for an App Bubble. What are your views on this ? A: Yes, the head and shoulder pattern did play itself out. I’m still going to answer the question about how I feel to be alone in my views rather than with the crowd — great. Much preferred. Contrarianism is a way of life. Still. Even when I’m wrong as a contrarian, which I was recently and will be again soon.

Q: I know you’re always talking about how the government has spent trillions in dollars in welfare to the banks and the wealthy. How have they done this? I know tarp bailed a lot of them out from bankruptcy. How else as far as direct and indirect means has the government been spending our tax payer money on helping the “banksters”? Does 0% interest rates and quantitative easing somehow cost the tax payer? A: The banks are borrowing money from the government at 0% interest rates and then lending that same money back to that same government at 3%.  That costs the taxpayers hundreds of billions if not trillions in free money for the banks every year that we allow it go on. The banks have trillions of dollars of mortgage securities that are worth twenty cents or so on the dollar.  But they are allowed to say that those assets are worth trillions.  So the banks are able to go on trading, securitizing, gambling and defrauding at will and then base their bonuses and shareholder dividends on those fake gains in their fake portfolios. The government also bought trillions of dollars in these 80% off mortgage securities for 100 cents on the dollar in the name of QE1 and QE2 and other names in the last three years. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were bailed out for $6 trillion which also goes into the pockets of their lenders/customers/partners — you guessed it, the banks. That’s just off the top of my head.

Q: What is your favorite short right now? Seems like you’re waiting on LPS to get a bump before jumping in more. A: I don’t quite have a favorite short right now. Matter of fact, as I think about it now, I think I’m likely feeling like most shorts do right now — our shorts just made us huge money and now we don’t know what to do with them. They’ve hardly bounced, but they act like they could pop more before crashing again. Ah, the psychology of a trader’s mind. Or should that be the psychosis of a trader’s mind.

Q: Do you think we’re gonna revisit or go lower than August lows and why? A: I think the longer we stay above the August lows, the more likely we are to steadily rally away from them. But until this market stops doing these 2% plus intraday dislocations, I’m leery about the near-term action and keeping cash ready to deploy in case we do crash not just to but even below those August lows.

Q: Sometimes you are very specific when buying calls or puts(which is great), but then like today you said with ADSK you where buying calls expiring in the next couple months… the average investor(like me) would probably prefer the specifics if possible…A: That is a great point and I will do my best to just outline each call option trade even more specifically. My mom was an English teacher for years and she always told me that her main job was just to get those kids to learn to communicate better. I’ll strive to communicate better.

Get into next week’s chat by signing up for a free one-week trial of TradingWithCody.com with just your email address. Click here.

Cody Willard writes Revolution Investing for MarketWatch and posts the trades from his personal account at TradingWithCody.com. At time of publication, Cody was net long Cisco, Google, Sandisk, Autodesk and net short LPS.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • email
  • Print