Brutal earnings season is coming and other must-read articles

Here’s some of what I’m reading and thinking about today.

Thinking About What Might Blow Up - David Merkel helped me make the decision to get out of my hedge fund entirely in late 2007 when the markets were topping. He predicted the US Credit Crisis and the current Sovereign Nation Crisis in the article he’s quoting here from back in 2007.  Fast forward to today, and he says: “Aside from private equity, I was right on most of these.  But what of today?” Read his latest take and give him your opinion of what might blow up next.  What, besides the obvious of Greece/EU contagion is keeping you guys up at night? And more importantly, does any of that matter to Apple’s (AAPL) and Google’s (GOOG) and Qualcomm’s (QCOM) earnings three years from now?

ETF Update for 9/22/11 - Man, talk about someone who’s been on fire. Most recently, Jeff Miller and his crew got short last Friday. Darn near the top. Read to get his latest outlook, which I think should be paid attention to.  He’s been using some ETFs like the SH and the DOG to make some big money lately. Yes, DOG really is an ETF.

Wall Street Braces for Brutal Earnings Season - The more pessimism we see heading into the earnings season, which rightly kicks off next week (have you signed up for the Marketwatch Fantasy Earnings Trader Game? I’m participating). I’m actually quite bullish, in particular on the technological sector fundamentals, heading into the earnings season.  Which leads me to the next link…

Buying Some Corning – Years ago, I rode a Corning (GLW) short from $18 to $2 where I covered, as Corning refinanced the business model and turned the company around. I even caught part of its recovery as a long in 2003/4. I did a little bit of buying in a name I hadn’t touched in many months having gotten back in initially too high this go-round. I truly had to double and triple check my math when I updated my fundamental models. Read the article for more, but it’ll blow your mind how cheap Corning has become.

With a Joint Statement, the Leading Economies Try to Reassure World Markets – As Yves Smith put it: “This was the political equivalent of administering a placebo.” How come these banks like Bank of America (BAC) and Citigroup (C) and their idiot shareholders who have continued to risk their money on these companies that would be admittedly insolvent without ongoing welfare and suddenly-legalized accounting gimmicks can’t just take their losses and move on?

And be sure to check out my Revolution Investing Newsletter published here on Marketwatch.

Cody Willard writes Revolution Investing for MarketWatch and posts the trades from his personal account at TradingWithCody.com. At time of publication, Cody was net long Apple, Google and Corning.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • email
  • Print

How trade the IT stocks now while they’re at 52-week lows

Here’s what I’m reading and thinking about this morning.

IT Slowdown? Come On, Man! – I’ve linked to my favorite tech trader, Jay Somaney, several times lately partly because he’s simply been on fire with his picks lately. In this one, he’s bulling on Infosys INFY, Cognizant CTSH and Tata TCS.  Meanwhile, here’s something I wrote on this sector recently…

Revolution Investment ratings for Akamai, F5, Netflix and six others – Q: Can you analyse INFY for me? It’s the biggest IT stock in India. A: INFY – If you believe that corporate America will continue to get huge tax benefits by laying off Americans and hiring supposed replacements in India for the next ten years, then INFY might be for you. If, on the other hand, you’ve ever dealt with outsourced services to India as a supplier (I’ve hired Indian programmers over the years to help me build websites…never have had a good experience or a product that they’ve built even come to market) or as a consumer (I get paid randomly late if at all by some of the biggest companies I write for and every time I ask “what the hell?” they say, “Payroll and accounts receivable is outsourced to India” and that’s the entire explanation) then you probably should think twice about betting on such outsourcing trends being sustainable. Revolution Investment rating: 2/10

13 cents away from a problem – Bruce is one of the best financial bloggers on the planet, frankly, and I read him every day. He’s more bearish about China in the near-term than I am, but this post is more about Bank of America and the financials anyway. As he puts it, “Jim Cramer is dead wrong. Another Lehman type event is staring us in the face. It will probably come first in Europe, but it will boomerang around and hit BAC hard.”  A seriously must-read article for anybody long or short anything in the banking sector.

Redacted Version of the September 2011 FOMC Statement – The Fed is redistributing trillions of dollars via their various “programs” and that makes them more important than they’ve ever been before. And they mattered before too. The point is that you need to read these painfully convoluted Fed statements.  The good news is that David Merkel’s easy-to-understand break down and commentary about each Fed announcement clears it up for you. He’s got some dry humor laced throughout this latest version.

Yahoo! blocked e-mails about Wall Street protests - Read the comments at the bottom of the article. Nobody, but nobody believes that this was a simply “mistake” as Yahoo! claims it is.  Conspiracy anybody?  Whatever, Yahoo is still a sell.

Look at yourself, H-P – Yahoo! YHOO, HP HPQ and maybe someday Microsoft MSFT — companies that would benefit immediately from new management. Why’s Softee’s board the only one still asleep? Ballmer’s got to go.

And be sure to check out my Revolution Investing Newsletter published here on Marketwatch.

Cody Willard writes Revolution Investing for MarketWatch and posts the trades from his personal account at TradingWithCody.com. At time of publication, Cody was net long Microsoft.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • email
  • Print

Bank of America is a penny stock and other must-read articles

Here’s what I’m reading and thinking about this morning.

13 cents away from a problem – Bruce is one of the best financial bloggers on the planet, frankly, and I read him every day. He’s more bearish about China in the near-term than I am, but this post is more about Bank of America and the financials anyway. As he puts it, “Jim Cramer is dead wrong. Another Lehman type event is staring us in the face. It will probably come first in Europe, but it will boomerang around and hit BAC hard.” A seriously must-read article for anybody long or short anything in the banking sector.

Redacted Version of the September 2011 FOMC Statement – The Fed is redistributing trillions of dollars via their various “programs” and that makes them more important than they’ve ever been before. And they mattered before too. The point is that you need to read these painfully convoluted Fed statements. The good news is that David Merkel’s easy-to-understand break down and commentary about each Fed announcement clears it up for you. He’s got some dry humor laced throughout this latest version.

IT Slowdown? Come On, Man! – I’ve linked to my favorite tech trader, Jay Somaney, several times lately partly because he’s simply been on fire with his picks lately. In this one, he’s bulling on Infosys INFY, Cognizant CTSH and Tata TCS. Meanwhile, here’s something I wrote on this sector recently…

Revolution Investment ratings for Akamai, F5, Netflix and six others – Q: Can you analyse INFY for me? It’s the biggest IT stock in India. A: INFY – If you believe that corporate America will continue to get huge tax benefits by laying off Americans and hiring supposed replacements in India for the next ten years, then INFY might be for you. If, on the other hand, you’ve ever dealt with outsourced services to India as a supplier (I’ve hired Indian programmers over the years to help me build websites…never have had a good experience or a product that they’ve built even come to market) or as a consumer (I get paid randomly late if at all by some of the biggest companies I write for and every time I ask “what the hell?” they say, “Payroll and accounts receivable is outsourced to India” and that’s the entire explanation) then you probably should think twice about betting on such outsourcing trends being sustainable. Revolution Investment rating: 2/10

Yahoo! blocked e-mails about Wall Street protests – Read the comments at the bottom of the article. Nobody, but nobody believes that this was a simply “mistake” as Yahoo! claims it is. Conspiracy anybody? Whatever, Yahoo is still a sell.

Look at yourself, H-P – Yahoo! YHOO, HP HPQ and maybe someday Microsoft MSFT — companies that would benefit immediately from new management. Why’s Softee’s board the only one still asleep? Ballmer’s got to go.

And be sure to check out my Revolution Investing Newsletter published here on Marketwatch.

Cody Willard writes Revolution Investing for MarketWatch and posts the trades from his personal account at TradingWithCody.com. At time of publication, Cody was net long Microsoft.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • email
  • Print

Weekend links: Five must-reads for every investor

Here are some Revolution Links to what I’m reading and thinking about today.

Value Investing and Financials – David Merkel is an old mentor and investor of mine. He’s the best value investor I know and he’s saying that the financials are not value stocks despite their ongoing crashing.  He’s also underscoring something very important here about the financials — “a lot of the outperformance of financials stemmed from the willingness of the Fed to engage in a reckless monetary policy”.  I’ve been short the financials including Wells Fargo since early this year because this stuff is all finally coming home to roost.

Summarizing RIMM – New, updated RIMM analysis from the best tech trader I know. His summary after last night’s earnings report: “There are plenty of reasons in RIMM’s report to warrant even further selling in the shares. We could be seeing new lows for the year tomorrow after the sellsiders slash their estimates and forecasts for the PlayBook offering.  I think the PlayBook is a definite goner.”  I agree with pretty much everything he writes in the article.

Did Donald Trump call the peak in gold? – A couple years ago when oil had spiked and was at $130 or so, I once confidently bet Donald Trump Jr on national TV that oil would see the $30s before it’d see $150.  In fact, his brazen bullishness on the commodity at that point emboldened me in a contrarianism kind of way. Oil peaked at $147 and subsequently dropped to $35 and I won that bet. You know what the payoff was supposed to be? His inheritance against mine.  He hasn’t tracked me down to pay off. Anyway, I’d rather see Donald Trump saying gold is going to $10,000 an ounce instead of being in my camp as a gold bear. I am still waiting to re-enter my GLD short. Now I’ll probably wait longer. Sigh.

BofA, JPMorgan Fail to Make Fannie Mae Grade for Loan Servicing – Like I said, I’m short the financials, especially targeting the TBTF banks like these guys who can’t even do the job they say they’re doing.  And when they do do their “loan servicing job”, it’s often full of robosignatures and title-chain nightmares.  BofA should declare bankruptcy instead of laying off 30,000 people to prop up cash flows and supposed profits for the near-term so its management can continue looting before they eventually collapse again under the weight of their horrid balance sheet which no amount of layoffs can fix anyway.

Economists Who Are Always ‘Surprised’ Should Re-Think Their Models and Assumptions – This would be hilarious if it weren’t so damn tragically true.  “Surprised” is another word for “dead wrong”.  Should we all be “surprised” these incompetent idiots at the Fed and Treasury and other higher ups in the Republican/Democrat regime keep their jobs? Being surprised constantly…it’s like the Apple analysts who are always “surprised” that Apple can sustain this torrid growth.  There will be people who will be surprised that Google’s Android has crossed the one-billion units sold mark sometime in the next few years.

And be sure to check out my Revolution Investing newsletter, published here on Marketwatch.

Cody Willard writes Revolution Investing for MarketWatch and posts the trades from his personal account at TradingWithCody.com. At time of publication, Cody was net long Apple, Google and net short Wells Fargo.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • email
  • Print

Best stocks to be long and short into year end

I met a bunch of subscribers to my independent service, TradingWithCody.com, for our weekly chat and we had a blast, as usual.  I’ve broken the chat down into two disparate (but not desperate!) sections:

1. Economy/markets/trading/strategy questions

2. Questions about individual stocks

Click here to read the Q&A about the economy, markets, trading and strategy.  Read on for the stock Q&A.  And be sure to check out TradingWithCody.com where I post all my trades in real-time.

Stocks

Q: Do you see all the cheaper tablet alternatives, especially in Asia (where there is an expectation for Apple to take off), affecting Apple’s margins, and hence growth plans, significantly? A: Great question about the margins at Apple and how they could be affected by mass cheap tablets…but the iPad is so much better and still ain’t exactly “expensive”…and further, I expect Apple will someday start selling iPad 2 for $200 or so after iPad 3 comes out at full price. Or maybe they’ll wait for iPad 4. Who knows. But Apple will likely have some very cheap iPads out there for you to buy in a few years just like they did with the iPhone after a few years.

Q: Cody, great job so far. Been with you for 4 months or so and have been very pleased. On August 17, we bought near term ADSK calls–actually the only near term calls we have ever bought. They are well out of the money at this point and was wondering what your thoughts were on this equity. A: Oh, the ADSK — that thing has been wildly volatile lately. The fundamentals, barring a complete collapse in the macroeconomy, are fine. I plan on holding ADSK for a couple years, but I don’t know if you’ll get lucky enough to get those near-term calls profitable in the next few weeks.

Q: Any views on INFN? A: The company’s only valued at $800MM total. They’ve got nearly $300MM in net cash in the checking account. That means you can buy the company at essentially $500MM enterprise value. The problem is that they aren’t profitable last year and will probably break even next year or so….so what’s the catalyst? I like the stock at these levels as a value investment, but I’m not pulling any triggers on it personally.

Q: Hi Cody, I have been a subscriber for two months and I am extremely happy with the service. I missed the entire LPS trade, and I would like to get into it. Do you think LPS is a short at this level, or shall we wait for a bounce above $19.00? A: Thanks for the kind words. I was just looking at LPS’ chat and also doing a bunch of homework on just how badly they really look to be screwed…I don’t see how that stock ever gets legs again, frankly. I might add to the short or buy some more puts in this one this week no matter where the stock is.

Q: Think LPS might get a pop if Obama recommends some mortgage problem help in his speech? If it does move then, would Friday be a good time to consider buying the puts? A: You just made my day with those kind words. Thanks for subscribing from the beginning! Yes, LPS could pop on something like Obama saying he’s going to prop up housing prices and try to brush under the rug the fraud in the industry. Indeed, the only catalyst I can see to the upside for LPS at all is political favoritism somehow coming into help them. In five years though (two years?), I think LPS will be gone. Hasta la vista. Zero.

Q: When do you think it is it time to short GLD and SLV? A: I think the big 4% drop in gold today might be a good indicator that the shorting time is nigh. But I’m not pulling any triggers til I really see the gold bugs start to cry.

Q: Do you ever trade AIG? Because today’s 10% pop is beginning for something. I know it is trash stock but for trade? What do you think? A: I wouldn’t gamble on AIG with my worst ex-girlfriend’s money. It is a, IMHO, totally insolvent, criminal enterprise that needs to be shut down immediately but continues to thrive using welfare funds. Game it at your own risk!

Q: Cody, I love what you are doing for us,thanks a lot.  Do you think we can do any trades, not investments, on RIMM earnings coming soon? A: I don’t like the RIMM much from the short or the long side right now at $31. When it hit $24 or so, I answered a question in this chat room saying something like “RIMM’s too low to short now” and it popped big since then. I don’t see any particular upside catalysts for the stock in the near-term, but the chart itself has turned up nicely and maybe just some tradeable action there. Not for me though.

Q: I am holding January $17.50 Cisco calls which are slightly in the green again. Do you see upside for Cisco toward year end or is it best to close out? I also hold January 13 calls so I am optimistic–thanks for your stock and market strategies. A: I’m also holding a wide array of Cisco calls. I wouldn’t own them at all if I didn’t think the stock was about to go higher into year end. I hope/pray it will. But hoping and praying isn’t an invest-able strategy. That said, I do think Cisco is trying to bottom here near $15 or so and I’ll probably continue to be a buyer. Going back to an earlier question about shorting puts….Shorting Cisco out-of-the-money puts wouldn’t be the worst idea ever. But I’m sticking with Cisco common and calls (though as I recall I was a seller of some of my calls when the stock popped after I’d been buying the calls before its earnings report even though I still have a wide array of those calls left).

Q: Cody, thoughts on ZAGG? I’ve had good results writing put options as they provide a decent return and the stock has been stable during the downturn. Potential upside for calls/common as the iPhone5 is due to be released? A: ZAGG’s a tough one. I spooked myself out of it when a colleague asked me about it a few months ago and I’m still not comfortable with it. Be careful with that one. My “spidey senses” go off when I study ZAGG and I can’t tell you why because I don’t know why ZAGG makes my spidey senses go off. But it does. So I stay away. Good luck with it tho!

Q: I had a question about Micron. It seems to be trading at a 30% discount to book value. Is this undervalued enough to buy, or do you not like the company enough? A: I don’t look at “book value” in my investment strategies much at all. I look at net cash, earnings, cash flows, EBITDA, margins…and also top down analysis like market positioning, sector growth, etc. I do like MU near $6, but I’d rather own SNDK at $37.

Q: Great call on the RVBD calls at the bottom. I loaded up as you did and they’re nicely profitable! Would you consider our latest downturn a triple bottom? If so, we have rebounded very nicely. How long is your gut telling you the rally might run for? Would it make sense to slap some out of the money puts on RVBD if it gets up around $27-$28? A: I do think we are trying to put in bottoms, but that doesn’t mean we have for sure. I’d like to see some of these stocks get back to where they were a few months ago before the next rally is truly over. But that’s a tall order.

Q: Cody, I am a new subscriber, but have been following you for a couple of months and I am really enjoying the service and your sense of humor. What do you think of AVAV? A: AeroVironment, Inc. designs, develops, produces, and supports unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), and efficient energy systems for various industries and governmental agencies. I don’t want to invest in companies that are dependent upon expanding wars for growth. In the next five to ten years, I expect our war expenditures to drastically decline one way or another. I’d look to eventually get short AVAV.

Read the economy/markets/trading/strategy Q&A by clicking here.

Check out TradingWithCody.com by clicking here.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • email
  • Print

Tech names poised to break

Gotta blame it on something, Gotta blame it on something Blame it on the rain that was falling, falling, Blame it on the stars that did shine at night  – Milli Vanilli

I mentioned earlier that it “felt” like the markets were likely to follow the Ruidoso weather pattern of late — sun in the morning, rain the afternoon. In other words, I was looking for an intraday fade today and that’s indeed what’s transpired.  Wonder what the mainstream media are blaming today’s sell off on? Let’s look:

Ah, that explains everything!  That ol’ “corporate, Euro news” sell-off catalyst that they talk about in the text books. What? No?  Oh, my bad.

Anyway, other than selling those Ciena CIEN calls for a big one-day profit that I explained in this earlier blog post, I’m sitting on my hands still.  Here’s some more of the feedback I got from subscribers just this morning:

Cody you are the MAN when it comes to making great earnings calls!  Nailed CIENA today thanks to your insights. Your earnings calls alone are worth many times the subscription price of your great service!  — Ron

Great calls, Cody!  You made me some money this morning!  — Bill

If you’d like to see how every trade I personally make in the coming days, weeks and years, come check me out at TradingWithCody.com.   At any rate, I’m actually not just hand-sitting.  I’m doing lots of homework on the stocks we own to stay up on top of the news, trends, etc.  Anybody else notice that Riverbed RVBD and Sandisk SNDK are up big from recent lows where we were buying calls? Gotta have some patience to let these things play out after making the bets we’ve made, as I keep preaching.   Anybody else looking at Apple AAPL and wondering if it might have a good 10%-15% move in it if it can get through the $400 level? Google GOOG got legs above $540 or so?

Speaking of preaching, Milli Vanilli and the stock market, before we go, take a look at this funny comment from this classic MTV video now on YouTube, not on MTV:

In a way, all of todays groups are some kind of a version of Milli Vannili with overproduced fake music, lipsyncing, autotune, and frontmen/women who cant sing worth a ****. I actually have more respect for these guys than today’s fake ****.


Think about that comment and think about how doomed Live Nation LYV really is, when you extrapolate what a complete collapse of stadium/platinum selling artists is going to do to that company and that industry in the next couple decades.

Come to think of it, I’m not really sure how I made the connection from Ruidoso rain to Milli Vanilli to today’s market action to Live Nation’s being doomed. But it worked, no?

Thanks for reading, see y’all tomorrow.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • email
  • Print

A trade is a trade is a trade: Time to sell this tech name down now

Flattish to down open early here this morning.  Since nobody cares about Greece’s sovereign debt problem or the U.S. budget crisis this week, maybe some macro economic news in Estonia was softer than expected today and we could focus on it.  Maybe a report out of Singapore about their savings rate increasing again should get us panicked tomorrow.

Then again, let’s continue to try to focus on what matters instead.  Speaking of which, yesterday in the closing hour, I’d bought some very high-risk Ciena CIEN calls because they were due to report this morning and as I’d mentioned at the time — sure was a lot of Ciena negativity (Cienagativity?) heading into the report.  As I wrote at the time on my TradingWithCody.com in I’ve now bought a little calls in…:

Ciena reports earnings tomorrow morning before the open and I’ve read nothing but explanations of why they are likely to really miss and guide lower and get crushed tomorrow.  And that might very well happen.

I think expectations are very low for Ciena heading into that report tomorrow morning. The problem is that if the company does disappoint there’s probably a 10% underside. That said, I’d expect Ciena comes in okay and that the stock pops tomorrow.

I’ve now bought some Ciena calls dated in October, working on strikes between $13 and $15 or so.  This is a very aggressive kind of trade, using such close expiry dates and out-of-the-money calls to boot, which means we’re likely to either catch a bin tomorrow or will end up with probably close to a total loss on the capital risked here.  We’ve had some pretty consistent and decent luck with these pre-earnings trades. –

The report is out and it’s pretty good, especially for those bulls who were looking for some margin expansion from the synergies of the major Nortel optical acquisition.  With both Cisco  CSCO and Ciena, the margins are likely to expand in coming quarters thereby driving earnings much faster than revenues.  Juniper JNPR, F5 FFIV and Akamai AKAM on the other hand, are topline growth stories as much as they are earnings growth stories for the next couple quarters at least. Margins are the main reason Ciena is up today — the topline was just okay.  Then again, with as much negativity as there was around Ciena heading into the report, maybe “just okay” is good enough to stimulate this pop today.

At any rate, Ciena is indeed up more than 17% as I type this.  The October calls we were buying yesterday are up double or more in value in less than one day’s action.  And I’m selling them down.  One of my old mentors used to always tell me, “Always remember that a trade is a trade is a trade.”  Meaning that you don’t want to confuse a trade with an investment.  We bought these calls as a trade and the trade worked out so let’s lock it in.  I’m keeping only about 1/5 of the calls I’d bought yesterday along with the core common stock position in Ciena that I plan on holding for the longer term.

If you’d like to see how every trade I personally make in the coming days, weeks and years, come check me out at TradingWithCody.com.   Here’s some of the feedback I got from subscribers just this morning:

Ok Cody, you convinced me, I’ll subscribe. After the CIEN trade I followed you on, I made 75% in 20 minute this am, more than enough for a 1 year subscription. Thanks, I’ll be following you. – Jeff

Thanks for ciena trade– made my week. Keep up the great work.  – Teri

You’re one of my heroes. You nailed the internet/connectivity, social media revolution before anyone else. You deserve your success! — Barry

Rock on.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • email
  • Print

Trading strategies for Apple in the post-Jobs era

Apple CEO Steve Jobs resigned last night.  Let’s discuss.

I’ll reprint the entirety of what Steve Jobs, the now ex-CEO of Apple, wrote in the letter he sent out at 4:40pm, two minutes before Apple itself followed his email blast up, with the formal announcement of their own:

To the Apple Board of Directors and the Apple Community:

I have always said if there ever came a day when I could no longer meet my duties and expectations as Apple’s CEO, I would be the first to let you know. Unfortunately, that day has come.

I hereby resign as CEO of Apple. I would like to serve, if the Board sees fit, as Chairman of the Board, director and Apple employee.

As far as my successor goes, I strongly recommend that we execute our succession plan and name Tim Cook as CEO of Apple.

I believe Apple’s brightest and most innovative days are ahead of it. And I look forward to watching and contributing to its success in a new role.

I have made some of the best friends of my life at Apple, and I thank you all for the many years of being able to work alongside you.

Steve

First, as a human being, I wish Mr. Jobs well and hope his health returns.

As investors in this company, this might actually remove one of the largest overhangs on this stock — the concern that Steve Jobs would leave at some point.  If you think about it, it’s likely that one of the reasons Apple has continually traded at a discount to the S&P 500 despite growing so much faster than just about any other company in that index for the last seven or eight years at least, is because of the concerns about Steve Jobs’ health. His departure, ironically perhaps, removes that overhang and might actually let this stock’s multiple expand to something more closely resembling the rest of the stocks in the S&P 500, who don’t have Steve Jobs running them either.   Bidu and Best Buy, for example, both have higher multiples on just about any metric, than Apple does. Netflix, CRM?  Their multiple is a multiple of Apple’s despite not having either the defensible positioning or true platform de facto standardization that Apple does. And they don’t have Steve Jobs running their company, much less as chairman, like Apple still does either.

Meanwhile, the iOS/iPhone/iPad platforms have become de facto standards in the marketplace and the virtuous cycle of developers creating apps and hardware that work for those products driving more consumers to those products driving more developers to create more apps…the Apple eco-system is unaffected.

The stock was down 5% last night after this announcement, but is now down less than 2% this morning in the pre-market action.  I wouldn’t be surprised to see this stock swing to both the down and upside during the intraday action today, and whether it closes higher today or not, I plan on holding my common and calls in this name or even buying more if the stock does get back down 5% lower or more today.

I first bought Apple here on these pages back in April 2003 at $7 a share and I held it til I closed my hedge fund and became a TV anchor.  I’ve bought it back since I started trading again this year and I remain very bullish on Apple.  Indeed as I’ve predicted before, I do think it’ll be a $1000 stock someday.  And this news, despite the sadness that it elicits in our hearts, doesn’t change either the target price or the timing of when we might get there in my analysis.

And if you’d like to see how I trade Apple in the coming days, weeks and years, come check me out at TradingWithCody.com, where you can see all my trades in real-time and get access to all of my investment books.  For a limited time, you can get a free one-week trial with just your email address by signing up here.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • email
  • Print

Who’s more scared, the bulls or the bears?

In this week’s Revolution Investing, I outline why I’ve been closing out some shorts this week and was adding to my tech longs in last week’s market crashes. It’s all about emotions out there right now.  In the newsletter, I write:

“The bears are celebrities again, and even though very few bears have caught this downside swing and ensuing volatility very well — the curse of the perma-bear is that they can’t differentiate timing — but they are loud and full of new predictions of new doom.   And the bear websites, the bearish pundits, the bearish hedge funders, are flaunting their genius, even as they wonder how they missed most of the move down.   They’ve now been shorting all rallies and are what they should have been at the top six weeks ago — aggressively net short.   And see, all that short stock out there must be bought back at some point — either lower or higher (or at these levels, too).  The  bears are now outright shorts and they’re cocked and loaded and feeling brave.”

Not much bear fear out there right now.  And how about the bulls? From the newsletter:

“Meanwhile, the bulls are beaten and depressed.  The emails from my (mostly formerly-) bullish money manager friends are full of doubt.  Indeed, most bulls (aka former longs) have been puking up most of their biggest positions to raise cash and try to salvage what was just a few weeks ago a good year but is now probably down 1-10% on the year.”

I’d like to ask you guys the same thing I asked subscribers of newsletter and of my independent trading service, TradingWithCody.com, “Who’s more scared right now, the bulls or the bears?”

Because when the answer to that question is as strong on one side as it is right now — do you know any bears who are scared right now? Do you know any bulls who are NOT scared right now? — it often coincides with a big turn in the market.

Not sure Apple, Google, Riverbed, Marvell and the others I’ve been buying back recently are truly bottomed out or not. But I’d rather be a buyer when the bulls are overwhelmingly scared, and I do think they are. Do you?

Some of the comments I’ve gotten so far:

I’m a bull and “scared” and I agree with you that the bears are not scared at this time. Accordingly, as a bull I see this as a good time to play the contrarian move and stay bullish.  Thanks for the easy money today that I booked on the RVBD calls. It was hard to buy them yesterday with the underlying stock of riverbed looking as bad as it did yesterday….I thank you!  – Les

I think the bulls are more scared because the prevailing media sentiment is one of doom and gloom. Most stories today cover the bump as “hopeful but unlikely speculation that the fed will intervene” followed by a slew of reports on slow housing starts, more disruption in Europe, etc. And personally it’s not hard to be scared when every rally of late seems to be followed by a steep fall.  There’s my 2 cents but I’m ever the optimist and roll my eyes whenever I hear another “apple can’t do it this time” story.  – Gregory

I vote that the bulls are more scared now, including myself – Bill

So you tell me, “Who’s more scared right now, the bulls or the bears?” Shoot me an email to contact@TradingWithCody.com or leave a comment below.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • email
  • Print

Cody Willard’s daily trading notes

Cross-posted with my independent site, TradingWithCody.com.

“If the good Lord had intended us to walk, he wouldn’t have invented roller skates.” – Willy Wonka

Good day to you and welcome back to the skating rink.  I’ve seen several headlines trumpeting how “The Bulls Are Storming Wall Street” and whatnot … but the markets themselves are up just over 1%, and given that action we’ve seen the last few weeks with 3% to 5% intraday moves seemingly routine, I wouldn’t be overstating a 1% move.

Meanwhile, I’ve not made any trades yet today, but I do see the LPS back above $17 (we started shorting it in the mid-$30s, mind you) on an incredibly rare 3% rally and I might add some puts in there or maybe just short some outright again.  We’ll see, but I’m not doing it just yet.

And before I go, here’s a quick note on the smartphone revolution from J.P. Morgan’s analysts:

Global Communications Equipment: Handset Model Update: Reducing Numbers on Faltering Consumer, But Increasing Smartphone Ests. We are reducing our 2011 handset shipment growth estimate to 6.4% from 6.8% but increasing our smartphone forecast for the full year. Consumer indicators are certainly shaky globally but not clearly in a downward trend yet. Our intention in this update is to begin factoring in the potential for worse consumer dynamics in H2 without going all the way to a recession scenario. Should consumer spending reverse in H2 we would expect a rapid reduction in phone sales from the levels we currently forecast as well as lower smartphone growth. At this point, however, we do not believe the data supports this scenario.

Two notes — you never, and I mean, NEVER want to take your macroeconomic analysis from these sector specialists.  That’s not to say that an economic downturn isn’t possible or even imminent (I think we’ll have some more bubbles before the next crash, but we’ll have to be flexible in case the realities turn out different than we expect), but I’ve seen many a great analyst chase himself out of stocks like Apple and Netflix over “concerns about the macro” and they are usually chasing the latest economic numbers as they do it.

But where you do pay attention to sector analysts is in the trends of the numbers that they’re modeling for the sectors that they specifically cover. In this case, the analyst is covering the handset sector, and he’s making some internal tweaks to his sector models — secular growth of the smartphone within the cyclical growth of the broader handset sector is one of the bases for the smartphone revolution.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • email
  • Print